Is Vitamin E Lethal?

Recently the news carried the story that aof vitamin E. Vitamin E is a mixture of tocopherols:
researcher had discovered that taking vitamin E at aalpha, beta, gamma and delta. But only alpha-
level of 400IU or more increases the risk of death.tocopheral was used. Not only that, but the synthetic
(Jan 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine I wasisomeric form, D, L-alpha tocopherol was used in
immediately suspicious because I have studied themany of the studies. Natural vitamin E exists in only
scientific literature on vitamin E for over two decadesthe D isomeric form. The synthetic L form is not
and have come to the exact opposite conclusion.produced in nature and may even interfere with the
Hundreds of studies have shown the beneficialbenefits of the natural D form.
effects of vitamin E on numerous modern diseasesThe gamma-tocopherol has many proven
including cancer, heart disease, Alzheimer's,life-lengthening and disease preventing benefits but
claudication, arthritis, fibrocystic breast disease,when high levels of alpha-tocopherol are consumed
epilepsy, infertility, intelligence…you name it.these benefits may be cancelled by a kind of
This evidence comes from carefully controlled clinicalbiochemical interference. Therefore, whatever
trials and meta-nalyses and is published ingamma-tocopherol was being consumed in the diet
peer-reviewed publications. So what gives with thismay have been cancelled out by the supplements in
new "scoop?" Why did it receive the headlines whilethe study.
all the other studies aren't?When one is done looking at the details behind the
Actually this new information is not new at all. Theheadlines there remains no basis for suggesting that
researcher merely investigated mortality statisticshigh levels of natural vitamin E are dangerous, but
from existing studies and came to a conclusion thatrather, when considering the entire body of scientific
people should not take 400IUs of vitamin E (exactlyevidence, there is significant reason for believing
what I have been taking for years andexactly the opposite! So much for headlines.
recommending to others) or they may die. In effectPerhaps more important than the misleading nature
he wrote an editorial on other people's work. That isof the story is the reason why it would receive top
not science.billing. News organizations seem to be fiendishly
Although the writer conceded his conclusions mayrubbing their hands together just waiting for any little
only apply to those who are already seriously ill andtidbit that could debunk the value of supplements or
not to healthy people, that is the only balance givena natural approach to health. (They receive huge
in the article. He examined 19 different vitamin Eadvertising dollars from the pharmaceutical and other
studies performed by others including almost 140,000medical industries.) Of course the medical community
people. Surely it would seem statistical meaning wouldis right there ready to pile on as well. They have a
emerge out of that. But as science (and life) alwaysvested interest in maintaining the popular mindset
goes, the truth is in the details…details toothat disease is just one of those things that happen,
often left out.that people are victims of disease, and doctors are
For example in one of the 19 studies, large doses ofneeded for repair. The notion that supplements, food,
zinc were also given and this can create a copperand lifestyle can prevent or cure disease threatens
deficiency which can lead to heart and othertheir grip and profitability.
diseases. Although a copper supplement was given, itNever mind that modern health care is the greatest
was in the form of cupric oxide, which is poorlythreat to life and health, killing more people than any
absorbed in the gut.other cause.
In another of the studies the group being given theWysong e-Health Letter: June 19, 2002
vitamin E were much sicker to begin with, includingThat's not worthy of news, but scaring people away
larger numbers of smokers and higher numbers offrom supplements based upon a flawed study is. We
those with coronary artery disease and high blooddo not live in a rational world.
pressure. Of course there will be greater mortality inIs vitamin E supplementation necessary? No, not if
such a group, but it would have nothing to do withyou are eating a varied diet of raw, organic, natural
the vitamin E they were taking.foods, living out of doors, exercising daily and are not
Another study was skewed by the fact thatsubject to any workplace or other environmental
participants were also taking a synthetic form ofpollutants. If that is not how you are living, then
beta-carotene, which has been linked to increased400IU of a natural vitamin E tocopherol mix is a very
lung cancer and liver damage. You can't give vitamin Egood idea. It is logical since it replaces what would be
and synthetic beta-carotene to a group and blamepresent in a natural raw diet and helps offset modern
mortality on vitamin E!toxins, pollutants and stresses. It is also supported by
Finally, not one of the studies used the natural forma mountain of good scientific research.